{{speculation}} and {{prophecy}} are not welcome on wikipedia. No articles about anticipated events are verifiable, because anticipated events are not reliable. They are not reliable, because they are not testable. Exceptional claims require exceptional references. :Category:Reliable Agents of Prediction is very small. Forward-looking documents and statements should be restricted to events that are almost certain to happen, considering how many times they happened and resources devoted to making them happen again.
This policy made strict does not mean deleting entire articles: Where wasteful prophecy is established on wikipedia:
Wiki-future, WP:IRC, talk pages, WP:E-MAIL and USENET are fine venues for writing about future, and it does not belong on wikipedia until it is a fact, so suspect sentences that contain words like "would", "could", "may", and "might", because they should tell you what makes them likely, almost now.
Should Wikipedia:CRYSTAL continue with exception? No, because as it is now, a lot of exceptions
wer already made. What about explicit mentions of the future?
If you can keep your head when all about you are losing theirs, then maybe you do not understand the situation.
Few if any rules are more sensible and pivotal than this to keep wikipedia verifiable and divide it from other media. Applying it to games and fiction is a big part of this. See if you hav a portable Login, because it is hard to start an article about fiction that will finish with facts.
Do not cut and paste this text anywhere. If it goes through your brain and gets mangled or justified by other means, then use it. If you can remember any of it verbatim, then find it licensed CC-SA, so you do not need to tell anybody who you stole an opinion from. Make it part of you.
